awt logo

2017-Park-District-5-CVR (Minneapolis; 2017-11-07)

🔗 2017-11-07_Minneapolis-2017-Park-District-5-CVR     (tags: { Minneapolis_MN , from-bolson , actual , 2017-11 , MN , 2017 , Minneapolis-2017 })

Below is the ABIF from the "2017-11-07_Minneapolis-2017-Park-District-5-CVR" election (2017-Park-District-5-CVR (Minneapolis; 2017-11-07))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

Results

🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2017-11-07_Minneapolis-2017-Park-District-5-CVR

The approval voting results of 2017-11-07_Minneapolis-2017-Park-District-5-CVR are below, and can be edited in the field above.

Method Winner
Approval Steffanie Musich
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

Approval voting results

2017-11-07_Minneapolis-2017-Park-District-5-CVR approval voting results permalink:
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2017-11-07_Minneapolis-2017-Park-District-5-CVR/approval#approval
📝
Note — Approval counts estimated from 16,238 ranked ballots using favorite_viable_half method
Details

The 'favorite_viable_half' conversion algorithm: find the candidate with the most first preferences, and then determine the minimum number of figurative seats that would need to be open in order for the candidate to exceed the Hare quota with the given first-prefs. We use this to estimate how many candidates are likely to be viable candidates.

Using first-choice vote totals as a rough guide, approximately 2 candidates appear viable: Steffanie Musich and Bill Shroyer. The approximation then assumes each voter approves up to 1 of their top-ranked viable candidates (half of 2). All candidates ranked at or above the lowest-ranked of each ballot's top viable candidates receive approval (considering up to 1 viable candidates per ballot).

See transformed ballots

Note: For Approval, these choose_many ballots are inferred from ranked ballots.

Conversion method: favorite_viable_half

#------- metadata -------
{ballotcount: 16238}
{version: "0.1"}
{ballotcount_abif_metadata: "16238"}
#------ candlines ------
=UWI:[UWI]
=[Steffanie Musich]:[Steffanie Musich]
=[Andrea Fahrenkrug]:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]
=[Bill Shroyer]:[Bill Shroyer]
#------- votelines ------
4332:[Steffanie Musich]/1
2064:[Steffanie Musich]/1
1406:[Bill Shroyer]/1
1260:[Steffanie Musich]/1
1047:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Steffanie Musich]/1
1003:[Steffanie Musich]/1
798:[Bill Shroyer]/1
687:[Steffanie Musich]/1
596:[Bill Shroyer]/1
587:[Bill Shroyer]/1
521:[Bill Shroyer]/1
397:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Bill Shroyer]/1
324:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Steffanie Musich]/1
214:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Bill Shroyer]/1
49:[Steffanie Musich]/1
34:[Steffanie Musich]/1
33:[Bill Shroyer]/1
22:[Bill Shroyer]/1
15:[Steffanie Musich]/1
13:[Bill Shroyer]/1
12:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Bill Shroyer]/1
12:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Steffanie Musich]/1
8:[Steffanie Musich]/1
6:[Steffanie Musich]/1
4:[Bill Shroyer]/1
4:[Steffanie Musich]/1
3:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Steffanie Musich]/1
3:[Bill Shroyer]/1
3:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Bill Shroyer]/1
3:[Bill Shroyer]/1
2:[Steffanie Musich]/1
2:[Steffanie Musich]/1=UWI/1
2:[Steffanie Musich]/1=UWI/1
2:[Steffanie Musich]/1=UWI/1
2:[Steffanie Musich]/1
2:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Bill Shroyer]/1=UWI/1
2:[Bill Shroyer]/1=UWI/1
1:[Bill Shroyer]/1
1:[Steffanie Musich]/1=UWI/1
1:[Bill Shroyer]/1
1:[Bill Shroyer]/1=UWI/1
1:[Bill Shroyer]/1
1:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Steffanie Musich]/1
1:[Bill Shroyer]/1
1:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Bill Shroyer]/1
1:[Bill Shroyer]/1=UWI/1
1:[Andrea Fahrenkrug]/1=[Steffanie Musich]/1=UWI/1
  • Approval Winner: Steffanie Musich
  • Approval Results:
    • Steffanie Musich — 10,861 approvals (66.89% of ballots) (✅ winner)
    • Bill Shroyer — 4,623 approvals (28.47% of ballots)
    • Andrea Fahrenkrug — 2,017 approvals (12.42% of ballots)
    • UWI — 14 approvals (0.09% of ballots)
  • Total: 16,238 ballots (17,515 total approvals)

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

(homepage)