awt logo

Debian 2021 Project Leader

πŸ”— DPL2021     (tags: { debian , actual , orgpriv , 2021 })

Below is the ABIF from the "DPL2021" election (Debian 2021 Project Leader)

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

Results

πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021

Below are the results of the election represented above using various election methods with abiftool/abiflib. The detected ballot type from the ABIF above is "ranked". Some methods may transform these ballots for analysis; see method notices for details. Resubmit the ABIF with "Transform ballots" turned off to minimize the transformations.

Method Winner
IRV/RCV Jonathan Carter
FPTP Jonathan Carter
Approval Jonathan Carter
STAR Jonathan Carter
Condorcet/Copeland Jonathan Carter
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

IRV/RCV results

DPL2021 IRV/RCV result permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021/IRV#IRV

  • IRV/RCV Winner: Jonathan Carter with 302 votes (66.4%) in final round
  • Runner-up: Sruthi Chandran with 100 votes (22.0%) in final round
  • Exhausted ballots in final round: 30 (6.6%)
  • Number of rounds: 1
  • Ballots counted in final round: 425 (93.4%)
  • Majority of ballots: 228 (50.1%)
  • Total ballots: 455
Round 1
Overview:
Active ballots: 455 (100.0%)

Exhausted ballots: 0 (0.0%)
Overvotes: 30 (6.6%)

Counted ballots: 425 (93.4%)
Winning threshold: 213 (46.81%)
IRV/RCV winner:
Jonathan Carter: 302 (66.4%)βœ…
β†’
Sruthi Chandran: 100 (22.0%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
None Of The Above: 23 (5.1%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’

Overvotes are ballots where multiple candidates are ranked at the same, highest-ranking position.

FPTP result

"FPTP" is "First-past-the-post", also known as "plurality" or "choose-one"
DPL2021 FPTP results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021/FPTP#FPTP
πŸ“
Note β€” Only using first-choices on ranked ballots

  • FPTP Winner: Jonathan Carter with 302 first-place votes (66.4%)
  • Runner-up: Sruthi Chandran with 100 first-place votes (22.0%)
  • Margin of victory: 202 votes (44.4 percentage points)
  • First-place votes
    • Jonathan Carter: 302 votes (66.4 %)
    • Sruthi Chandran: 100 votes (22.0 %)
    • None Of The Above: 23 votes (5.1 %)
  • Overvotes: 30 (6.6 %)
  • Total ballots: 455

Approval voting results

DPL2021 approval voting results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021/approval#approval
πŸ“
Note β€” Approval counts estimated from 455 ranked ballots using favorite_viable_half method
Details

The 'favorite_viable_half' conversion algorithm: find the candidate with the most first preferences, and then determine the minimum number of figurative seats that would need to be open in order for the candidate to exceed the Hare quota with the given first-prefs. We use this to estimate how many candidates are likely to be viable candidates.

Using first-choice vote totals as a rough guide, approximately 2 candidates appear viable: Jonathan Carter and Sruthi Chandran. The approximation then assumes each voter approves up to 1 of their top-ranked viable candidates (half of 2). All candidates ranked at or above the lowest-ranked of each ballot's top viable candidates receive approval (considering up to 1 viable candidates per ballot).

See transformed ballots

Note: For Approval, these choose_many ballots are inferred from ranked ballots.

Conversion method: favorite_viable_half

#------- metadata -------
{ballotcount: 455}
{ballotcount_abif_metadata: "455"}
{description: "2021 Debian Project Leader election, won by Jonathan Carter."}
{is_ranking_to_rating: true}
#------ candlines ------
=JonathanCarter:[Jonathan Carter]
=SruthiChandran:[Sruthi Chandran]
=NOTA:[None Of The Above]
#------- votelines ------
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:NOTA/1=SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:NOTA/1=SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1=NOTA/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
1:SruthiChandran/1
1:JonathanCarter/1
  • Approval Winner: Jonathan Carter
  • Approval Results:
    • Jonathan Carter (JonathanCarter) — 317 approvals (69.67% of ballots) (βœ… winner)
    • Sruthi Chandran (SruthiChandran) — 102 approvals (22.42% of ballots)
    • None Of The Above (NOTA) — 17 approvals (3.74% of ballots)
  • Total: 455 ballots (436 total approvals)

STAR results

DPL2021 STAR results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021/STAR#STAR
πŸ“
Note β€” STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 3 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 2 points, the 2nd choice gets 1 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: Jonathan Carter
  • Finalists: Jonathan Carter vs Sruthi Chandran
  • Runoff result:
    • Jonathan Carter: 312 votes (68.6%)
    • Sruthi Chandran: 102 votes (22.4%)
    • No preference: 41 voters (9.0%)
  • Total stars allocated: 1,380
  • Total ballots: 455
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
(one star above is approximately 28 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • β˜…#0: Jonathan Carter received 768 stars (55.7%) from 436 voters (95.8%)
    • β˜…#1: Sruthi Chandran received 480 stars (34.8%) from 350 voters (76.9%)
    • β˜…#2: None Of The Above received 132 stars (9.6%) from 109 voters (24.0%)
  • Finalists:
    • β˜…Jonathan Carter (βœ… winner) preferred by 312 of 455 voters
    • β˜…Sruthi Chandran preferred by 102 of 455 voters
    • β˜…No preference between the finalists: 41

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Condorcet/Copeland results

DPL2021 Condorcet/Copeland results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021/pairwise#pairwise
  • Winner: Jonathan Carter
  • Runner-up: Sruthi Chandran (beats all other candidates except Jonathan Carter)
  • Smallest margin: Jonathan Carter over Sruthi Chandran (312-102; margin: 210)
  • Largest margin: Jonathan Carter over None Of The Above (421-30; margin: 391)
  • Pairwise ties: none
  • Total ballots: 455

Win-loss-tie (Condorcet/Copeland) table

DPL2021 w-l-t table permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021/pairwise#wlt
Debian 2021 Project Leader pairwise matchups
Jonathan Carter
(2-0-0)
Jonathan Carter
2 victories ⇣
Sruthi Chandran
(1-1-0)
Jonathan Carter: 312(68.6%)
Sruthi Chandran: 102(22.4%)
(No preference: 41; 9.0%)
Sruthi Chandran
⇽ 1 loss / 1 victory† ⇣
None Of The Above
(0-2-0)
Jonathan Carter: 421(92.5%)
None Of The Above: 30(6.6%)
(No preference: 4; 0.9%)
Sruthi Chandran: 341(74.9%)
None Of The Above: 81(17.8%)
(No preference: 33; 7.3%)

Pairwise tournament (Copeland ordered)

DPL2021 pairwise diagram permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/DPL2021/pairwise#dot

%3 JonathanCarter JonathanCarter 2-0-0 (2 wins, 0 losses, 0 ties) SruthiChandran SruthiChandran 1-1-0 JonathanCarter->SruthiChandran ← JonathanCarter: 312 SruthiChandran: 102 NOTA NOTA 0-2-0 JonathanCarter->NOTA ← JonathanCarter: 421 NOTA: 30 SruthiChandran->NOTA ← SruthiChandran: 341 NOTA: 81

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

(homepage)