Tennessee example with STAR voting (Tennessee capitol)

🔗 TNexampleSTAR (tags: { theoretical })

Below is the ABIF from the "TNexampleSTAR" election (Tennessee example with STAR voting (Tennessee capitol))

ABIF submission area (show)

Method options

FPTP results?

IRV/RCV results?

IRV extra analysis?

Approval results?

STAR results?

pairwise (Condorcet/Copeland) results?

pairwise tournament diagram?

Ballot options Transform ballots (using ballot-type metadata)?

Voting methods: FPTP • approval • IRV • STAR • Pairwise • All methods

Results

🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/TNexampleSTAR

The approval voting results of TNexampleSTAR are below, and can be edited in the field above.

Method	Winner
Approval	Nashville, TN

OFF ON tabbed view

Approval voting results

TNexampleSTAR approval voting results permalink:
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/TNexampleSTAR/approval#approval

📝

Note — Approval counts estimated from 100 rated ballots using favorite_viable_half method

Details

The 'favorite_viable_half' conversion algorithm: find the candidate with the most first preferences, and then determine the minimum number of figurative seats that would need to be open in order for the candidate to exceed the Hare quota with the given first-prefs. We use this to estimate how many candidates are likely to be viable candidates.

Using first-choice vote totals as a rough guide, approximately 3 candidates appear viable: Memphis, TN, Nashville, TN, and Knoxville, TN. The approximation then assumes each voter approves up to 2 of their top-ranked viable candidates (half of 3, rounded up). All candidates ranked at or above the lowest-ranked of each ballot's top viable candidates receive approval (considering up to 2 viable candidates per ballot).

See transformed ballots

Note: For Approval, these choose_many ballots are inferred from rated ballots.

Conversion method: favorite_viable_half

#------- metadata -------
{ballotcount: 100}
{title: "Tennessee capitol example"}
{description: "Hypothetical example of selecting capitol of Tennessee, frequently used on Wikipedia and electowiki.  This example uses theoretical STAR voting choices loosely based on distance between the cities."}
{min_rating: "0"}
{max_rating: "5"}
#------ candlines ------
=Memph:[Memphis, TN]
=Nash:[Nashville, TN]
=Chat:[Chattanooga, TN]
=Knox:[Knoxville, TN]
#------- votelines ------
42:Memph/1=Nash/1
26:Chat/1=Knox/1=Nash/1
17:Chat/1=Knox/1=Nash/1
15:Chat/1=Knox/1=Nash/1

Approval Winner: Nashville, TN
Approval Results:
- Nashville, TN (Nash) — 100 approvals (100.0% of ballots) (✅ winner)
- Chattanooga, TN (Chat) — 58 approvals (58.0% of ballots)
- Knoxville, TN (Knox) — 58 approvals (58.0% of ballots)
- Memphis, TN (Memph) — 42 approvals (42.0% of ballots)
Total: 100 ballots (258 total approvals)

Voting methods: FPTP • approval • IRV • STAR • Pairwise • All methods

(homepage)

abif.electorama.com is maintained as part of the electorama.com family of websites.
Source code:


          github.com/electorama/abiftool

(for the core library) and github.com/electorama/awt (for the web presentation code)
Bug reports:


        
          github.com/electorama/awt/issues