More complicated example (Tennessee capitol)
Below is the ABIF from the "TNexampleScores" election (More complicated example (Tennessee capitol))
Voting methods: FPTP • approval • IRV • STAR • Pairwise • All methods
Results
The Condorcet/Copeland results of TNexampleScores are below, and can be edited in the field above.
| Method | Winner |
|---|---|
| Condorcet/Copeland | Nashville, TN |
Condorcet/Copeland results
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/TNexampleScores/pairwise#pairwise
- Winner: Nashville, TN
- Runner-up: Chattanooga, TN (beats all other candidates except Nashville, TN)
- Smallest margin: Nashville, TN over Memphis, TN (58-42; margin: 16)
- Largest margin: Chattanooga, TN over Knoxville, TN (83-17; margin: 66)
- Pairwise ties: none
- Total ballots: 100
Win-loss-tie (Condorcet/Copeland) table
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/TNexampleScores/pairwise#wlt
|
Nashville, TN
(3-0-0)
|
Nashville, TN
3 victories ⇣ |
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Chattanooga, TN
(2-1-0)
|
Nashville, TN:
68(68.0%)
Chattanooga, TN:
32(32.0%)
(No preference: 0; 0.0%)
|
Chattanooga, TN
⇽ 1 loss / 2 victories† ⇣ |
|
|
Knoxville, TN
(1-2-0)
|
Nashville, TN:
68(68.0%)
Knoxville, TN:
32(32.0%)
(No preference: 0; 0.0%)
|
Chattanooga, TN:
83(83.0%)
Knoxville, TN:
17(17.0%)
(No preference: 0; 0.0%)
|
Knoxville, TN
⇽ 2 losses / 1 victory† ⇣ |
|
Memphis, TN
(0-3-0)
|
Nashville, TN:
58(58.0%)
Memphis, TN:
42(42.0%)
(No preference: 0; 0.0%)
|
Chattanooga, TN:
58(58.0%)
Memphis, TN:
42(42.0%)
(No preference: 0; 0.0%)
|
Knoxville, TN:
58(58.0%)
Memphis, TN:
42(42.0%)
(No preference: 0; 0.0%)
|
Pairwise tournament (Copeland ordered)
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/TNexampleScores/pairwise#dot
Voting methods: FPTP • approval • IRV • STAR • Pairwise • All methods
(homepage)
