awt logo

2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05)

πŸ”— 2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR     (tags: { Minneapolis_MN , from-bolson , actual , MN , 2013-11 , 2013 , Minneapolis-2013 })

Below is the ABIF from the "2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR" election (2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

Results

πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR

Below are the results of the election represented above using various election methods with abiftool/abiflib. The detected ballot type from the ABIF above is "ranked". Some methods may transform these ballots for analysis; see method notices for details. Resubmit the ABIF with "Transform ballots" turned off to minimize the transformations.

Method Winner
IRV/RCV LISA BENDER
FPTP LISA BENDER
Approval LISA BENDER
STAR LISA BENDER
Condorcet/Copeland LISA BENDER
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

IRV/RCV results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR IRV/RCV result permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR/IRV#IRV

  • IRV/RCV Winner: LISA BENDER with 3,712 votes (64.2%) in final round
  • Runner-up: MEG TUTHILL with 1,736 votes (30.0%) in final round
  • Exhausted ballots in final round: 0 (0.0%)
  • Number of rounds: 1
  • Ballots counted in final round: 5,785 (100.0%)
  • Majority of ballots: 2,893 (50.0%)
  • Total ballots: 5,785
Round 1
Overview:
Active ballots: 5,785 (100.0%)

Exhausted ballots: 0 (0.0%)
Counted ballots: 5,785 (100.0%)
IRV/RCV winner:
LISA BENDER: 3,712 (64.2%)βœ…
β†’
MEG TUTHILL: 1,736 (30.0%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
NATE GRIGGS: 228 (3.9%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
SCOTT HARGARTEN: 97 (1.7%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
UWI: 12 (0.2%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’

FPTP result

"FPTP" is "First-past-the-post", also known as "plurality" or "choose-one"
2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR FPTP results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR/FPTP#FPTP
πŸ“
Note β€” Only using first-choices on ranked ballots

  • FPTP Winner: LISA BENDER with 3,712 first-place votes (64.2%)
  • Runner-up: MEG TUTHILL with 1,736 first-place votes (30.0%)
  • Margin of victory: 1,976 votes (34.2 percentage points)
  • First-place votes
    • LISA BENDER: 3,712 votes (64.2 %)
    • MEG TUTHILL: 1,736 votes (30.0 %)
    • NATE GRIGGS: 228 votes (3.9 %)
    • SCOTT HARGARTEN: 97 votes (1.7 %)
    • UWI: 12 votes (0.2 %)
  • Total ballots: 5,785

Approval voting results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR approval voting results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR/approval#approval
πŸ“
Note β€” Approval counts estimated from 5,785 ranked ballots using favorite_viable_half method
Details

The 'favorite_viable_half' conversion algorithm: find the candidate with the most first preferences, and then determine the minimum number of figurative seats that would need to be open in order for the candidate to exceed the Hare quota with the given first-prefs. We use this to estimate how many candidates are likely to be viable candidates.

Using first-choice vote totals as a rough guide, approximately 2 candidates appear viable: LISA BENDER and MEG TUTHILL. The approximation then assumes each voter approves up to 1 of their top-ranked viable candidates (half of 2). All candidates ranked at or above the lowest-ranked of each ballot's top viable candidates receive approval (considering up to 1 viable candidates per ballot).

See transformed ballots

Note: For Approval, these choose_many ballots are inferred from ranked ballots.

Conversion method: favorite_viable_half

#------- metadata -------
{ballotcount: 5785}
{version: "0.1"}
{ballotcount_abif_metadata: "5785"}
{is_ranking_to_rating: true}
#------ candlines ------
=UWI:[UWI]
=[LISA BENDER]:[LISA BENDER]
=[MEG TUTHILL]:[MEG TUTHILL]
=[NATE GRIGGS]:[NATE GRIGGS]
=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]:[SCOTT HARGARTEN]
#------- votelines ------
1247:[LISA BENDER]/1
978:[LISA BENDER]/1
602:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
460:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
420:[LISA BENDER]/1
300:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
246:[LISA BENDER]/1
180:[LISA BENDER]/1
163:[LISA BENDER]/1
125:[LISA BENDER]/1
124:[LISA BENDER]/1
102:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
70:[LISA BENDER]/1
65:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
57:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
53:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
44:[LISA BENDER]/1
36:[LISA BENDER]/1
34:[LISA BENDER]/1
28:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
19:[LISA BENDER]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
18:[LISA BENDER]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
18:[MEG TUTHILL]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
18:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
18:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
16:[LISA BENDER]/1
14:[LISA BENDER]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
12:[LISA BENDER]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
11:[MEG TUTHILL]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
10:[LISA BENDER]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
10:[MEG TUTHILL]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
9:[LISA BENDER]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
9:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
9:[LISA BENDER]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
9:[MEG TUTHILL]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
9:[LISA BENDER]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
8:[LISA BENDER]/1
7:[MEG TUTHILL]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
7:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
7:[LISA BENDER]/1
5:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
5:[MEG TUTHILL]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
4:[LISA BENDER]/1
4:[MEG TUTHILL]/1=[SCOTT HARGARTEN]/1
3:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
3:[LISA BENDER]/1
3:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
2:[LISA BENDER]/1=UWI/1
2:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
2:[LISA BENDER]/1
1:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1
1:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
1:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1=UWI/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1=[NATE GRIGGS]/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1
1:[LISA BENDER]/1
1:[MEG TUTHILL]/1
  • Approval Winner: LISA BENDER
  • Approval Results:
    • LISA BENDER — 3,817 approvals (65.98% of ballots) (βœ… winner)
    • MEG TUTHILL — 1,800 approvals (31.11% of ballots)
    • NATE GRIGGS — 124 approvals (2.14% of ballots)
    • SCOTT HARGARTEN — 93 approvals (1.61% of ballots)
    • UWI — 3 approvals (0.05% of ballots)
  • Total: 5,785 ballots (5,837 total approvals)

STAR results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR STAR results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR/STAR#STAR
πŸ“
Note β€” STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 5 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 4 points, the 2nd choice gets 3 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: LISA BENDER
  • Finalists: LISA BENDER vs MEG TUTHILL
  • Runoff result:
    • LISA BENDER: 3,817 votes (66.0%)
    • MEG TUTHILL: 1,800 votes (31.1%)
    • No preference: 168 voters (2.9%)
  • Total stars allocated: 39,023
  • Total ballots: 5,785
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
(one star above is approximately 780 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • β˜…#0: LISA BENDER received 18,405 stars (47.2%) from 4,941 voters (85.4%)
    • β˜…#1: MEG TUTHILL received 12,390 stars (31.8%) from 3,626 voters (62.7%)
    • β˜…#2: NATE GRIGGS received 4,897 stars (12.5%) from 1,874 voters (32.4%)
    • β˜…#3: SCOTT HARGARTEN received 2,935 stars (7.5%) from 1,151 voters (19.9%)
    • β˜…#4: UWI received 396 stars (1.0%) from 158 voters (2.7%)
  • Finalists:
    • β˜…LISA BENDER (βœ… winner) preferred by 3,817 of 5,785 voters
    • β˜…MEG TUTHILL preferred by 1,800 of 5,785 voters
    • β˜…No preference between the finalists: 168

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Condorcet/Copeland results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR Condorcet/Copeland results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR/pairwise#pairwise
  • Winner: LISA BENDER
  • Runner-up: MEG TUTHILL (beats all other candidates except LISA BENDER)
  • Smallest margin: SCOTT HARGARTEN over UWI (1,147-133; margin: 1,014)
  • Largest margin: LISA BENDER over UWI (4,937-40; margin: 4,897)
  • Pairwise ties: none
  • Total ballots: 5,785

Win-loss-tie (Condorcet/Copeland) table

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR w-l-t table permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR/pairwise#wlt
2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05) pairwise matchups
LISA BENDER
(4-0-0)
LISA BENDER
4 victories ⇣
MEG TUTHILL
(3-1-0)
LISA BENDER: 3,817(66.0%)
MEG TUTHILL: 1,800(31.1%)
(No preference: 168; 2.9%)
MEG TUTHILL
⇽ 1 loss / 3 victories† ⇣
NATE GRIGGS
(2-2-0)
LISA BENDER: 4,797(82.9%)
NATE GRIGGS: 477(8.2%)
(No preference: 511; 8.8%)
MEG TUTHILL: 3,428(59.3%)
NATE GRIGGS: 941(16.3%)
(No preference: 1,416; 24.5%)
NATE GRIGGS
⇽ 2 losses / 2 victories† ⇣
SCOTT HARGARTEN
(1-3-0)
LISA BENDER: 4,854(83.9%)
SCOTT HARGARTEN: 317(5.5%)
(No preference: 614; 10.6%)
MEG TUTHILL: 3,539(61.2%)
SCOTT HARGARTEN: 713(12.3%)
(No preference: 1,533; 26.5%)
NATE GRIGGS: 1,608(27.8%)
SCOTT HARGARTEN: 758(13.1%)
(No preference: 3,419; 59.1%)
SCOTT HARGARTEN
⇽ 3 losses / 1 victory† ⇣
UWI
(0-4-0)
LISA BENDER: 4,937(85.3%)
UWI: 40(0.7%)
(No preference: 808; 14.0%)
MEG TUTHILL: 3,623(62.6%)
UWI: 86(1.5%)
(No preference: 2,076; 35.9%)
NATE GRIGGS: 1,871(32.3%)
UWI: 137(2.4%)
(No preference: 3,777; 65.3%)
SCOTT HARGARTEN: 1,147(19.8%)
UWI: 133(2.3%)
(No preference: 4,505; 77.9%)

Pairwise tournament (Copeland ordered)

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR pairwise diagram permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-10-CVR/pairwise#dot

%3 LISA BENDER LISA BENDER 4-0-0 (4 wins, 0 losses, 0 ties) MEG TUTHILL MEG TUTHILL 3-1-0 LISA BENDER->MEG TUTHILL ← LISA BENDER: 3817 MEG TUTHILL: 1800 NATE GRIGGS NATE GRIGGS 2-2-0 LISA BENDER->NATE GRIGGS ← LISA BENDER: 4797 NATE GRIGGS: 477 SCOTT HARGARTEN SCOTT HARGARTEN 1-3-0 LISA BENDER->SCOTT HARGARTEN ← LISA BENDER: 4854 SCOTT HARGARTEN: 317 UWI UWI 0-4-0 LISA BENDER->UWI ← LISA BENDER: 4937 UWI: 40 MEG TUTHILL->NATE GRIGGS ← MEG TUTHILL: 3428 NATE GRIGGS: 941 MEG TUTHILL->SCOTT HARGARTEN ← MEG TUTHILL: 3539 SCOTT HARGARTEN: 713 MEG TUTHILL->UWI ← MEG TUTHILL: 3623 UWI: 86 NATE GRIGGS->SCOTT HARGARTEN ← NATE GRIGGS: 1608 SCOTT HARGARTEN: 758 NATE GRIGGS->UWI ← NATE GRIGGS: 1871 UWI: 137 SCOTT HARGARTEN->UWI ← SCOTT HARGARTEN: 1147 UWI: 133

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

(homepage)