awt logo

2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05)

πŸ”— 2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR     (tags: { Minneapolis_MN , from-bolson , actual , MN , 2013-11 , 2013 , Minneapolis-2013 })

Below is the ABIF from the "2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR" election (2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

Results

πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR

Below are the results of the election represented above using various election methods with abiftool/abiflib. The detected ballot type from the ABIF above is "ranked". Some methods may transform these ballots for analysis; see method notices for details. Resubmit the ABIF with "Transform ballots" turned off to minimize the transformations.

Method Winner
IRV/RCV BLONG YANG
FPTP BLONG YANG
Approval BLONG YANG
STAR BLONG YANG
Condorcet/Copeland BLONG YANG
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

IRV/RCV results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR IRV/RCV result permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR/IRV#IRV

  • IRV/RCV Winner: BLONG YANG with 1,842 votes (52.6%) in final round
  • Runner-up: IAN ALEXANDER with 1,394 votes (39.8%) in final round
  • Exhausted ballots in final round: 263 (7.5%)
  • Number of rounds: 4
  • Ballots counted in final round: 3,236 (92.5%)
  • Majority of ballots: 1,750 (50.0%)
  • Total ballots: 3,499
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4
Overview:
Active ballots: 3,499 (100.0%)

Exhausted ballots: 0 (0.0%)
Counted ballots: 3,499 (100.0%)
Overview:
Active ballots: 3,499 (100.0%)

Exhausted ballots: 7 (0.2%)
Counted ballots: 3,492 (99.8%)
Winning threshold: 1,747 (49.93%)
Overview:
Active ballots: 3,499 (100.0%)

Exhausted ballots: 68 (1.9%)
Counted ballots: 3,431 (98.1%)
Winning threshold: 1,716 (49.04%)
Overview:
Active ballots: 3,499 (100.0%)

Exhausted ballots: 263 (7.5%)
Counted ballots: 3,236 (92.5%)
Winning threshold: 1,619 (46.27%)
BLONG YANG: 1,475 (42.2%)
β†’
BLONG YANG: 1,476 (42.2%)
β†’
BLONG YANG: 1,548 (44.2%)
β†’
IRV/RCV winner:
BLONG YANG: 1,842 (52.6%)βœ…
β†’
IAN ALEXANDER: 1,048 (30.0%)
β†’
IAN ALEXANDER: 1,048 (30.0%)
β†’
IAN ALEXANDER: 1,087 (31.1%)
β†’
IAN ALEXANDER: 1,394 (39.8%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
BRETT BUCKNER: 746 (21.3%)
β†’
BRETT BUCKNER: 747 (21.3%)
β†’
BRETT BUCKNER: 796 (22.7%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
BRETT BUCKNER
KALE R. SEVERSON: 220 (6.3%)
β†’
KALE R. SEVERSON: 221 (6.3%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
KALE R. SEVERSON KALE R. SEVERSON
UWI: 10 (0.3%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
UWI UWI UWI

FPTP result

"FPTP" is "First-past-the-post", also known as "plurality" or "choose-one"
2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR FPTP results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR/FPTP#FPTP
πŸ“
Note β€” Only using first-choices on ranked ballots

  • FPTP Winner: BLONG YANG with 1,475 first-place votes (42.2%)
  • Runner-up: IAN ALEXANDER with 1,048 first-place votes (30.0%)
  • Margin of victory: 427 votes (12.2 percentage points)
  • First-place votes
    • BLONG YANG: 1,475 votes (42.2 %)
    • IAN ALEXANDER: 1,048 votes (30.0 %)
    • BRETT BUCKNER: 746 votes (21.3 %)
    • KALE R. SEVERSON: 220 votes (6.3 %)
    • UWI: 10 votes (0.3 %)
  • Total ballots: 3,499

Approval voting results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR approval voting results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR/approval#approval
πŸ“
Note β€” Approval counts estimated from 3,499 ranked ballots using favorite_viable_half method
Details

The 'favorite_viable_half' conversion algorithm: find the candidate with the most first preferences, and then determine the minimum number of figurative seats that would need to be open in order for the candidate to exceed the Hare quota with the given first-prefs. We use this to estimate how many candidates are likely to be viable candidates.

Using first-choice vote totals as a rough guide, approximately 3 candidates appear viable: BLONG YANG, IAN ALEXANDER, and BRETT BUCKNER. The approximation then assumes each voter approves up to 2 of their top-ranked viable candidates (half of 3, rounded up). All candidates ranked at or above the lowest-ranked of each ballot's top viable candidates receive approval (considering up to 2 viable candidates per ballot).

See transformed ballots

Note: For Approval, these choose_many ballots are inferred from ranked ballots.

Conversion method: favorite_viable_half

#------- metadata -------
{ballotcount: 3499}
{version: "0.1"}
{ballotcount_abif_metadata: "3499"}
{is_ranking_to_rating: true}
#------ candlines ------
=UWI:[UWI]
=[BLONG YANG]:[BLONG YANG]
=[IAN ALEXANDER]:[IAN ALEXANDER]
=[BRETT BUCKNER]:[BRETT BUCKNER]
=[KALE R. SEVERSON]:[KALE R. SEVERSON]
#------- votelines ------
602:[BLONG YANG]/1
268:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
227:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
219:[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
204:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
192:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
185:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
164:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
130:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
126:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
91:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
77:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
65:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
61:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
52:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
51:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
51:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
49:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
46:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
44:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
43:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
43:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
43:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
36:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
34:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
29:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
24:[BLONG YANG]/1
24:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
24:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
23:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
21:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
20:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
16:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
12:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
12:[BLONG YANG]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
11:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
10:[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
8:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
7:[BLONG YANG]/1
7:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
6:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
6:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
5:[BLONG YANG]/1
5:[BLONG YANG]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
4:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
4:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
4:[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
3:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
3:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
3:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
3:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
3:[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
3:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
3:[BLONG YANG]/1
2:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
2:[BLONG YANG]/1
2:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
2:[BLONG YANG]/1
2:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
2:[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
1:[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=UWI/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1=UWI/1
1:[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=UWI/1
1:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=UWI/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[IAN ALEXANDER]/1=UWI/1
1:[BRETT BUCKNER]/1=[KALE R. SEVERSON]/1
1:[BLONG YANG]/1=[BRETT BUCKNER]/1
  • Approval Winner: BLONG YANG
  • Approval Results:
    • BLONG YANG — 2,359 approvals (67.42% of ballots) (βœ… winner)
    • IAN ALEXANDER — 1,871 approvals (53.47% of ballots)
    • BRETT BUCKNER — 1,532 approvals (43.78% of ballots)
    • KALE R. SEVERSON — 379 approvals (10.83% of ballots)
    • UWI — 5 approvals (0.14% of ballots)
  • Total: 3,499 ballots (6,146 total approvals)

STAR results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR STAR results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR/STAR#STAR
πŸ“
Note β€” STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 5 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 4 points, the 2nd choice gets 3 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: BLONG YANG
  • Finalists: BLONG YANG vs IAN ALEXANDER
  • Runoff result:
    • BLONG YANG: 1,842 votes (52.6%)
    • IAN ALEXANDER: 1,394 votes (39.8%)
    • No preference: 263 voters (7.5%)
  • Total stars allocated: 25,111
  • Total ballots: 3,499
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
(one star above is approximately 502 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • β˜…#0: BLONG YANG received 9,180 stars (36.6%) from 2,736 voters (78.2%)
    • β˜…#1: IAN ALEXANDER received 7,217 stars (28.7%) from 2,205 voters (63.0%)
    • β˜…#2: BRETT BUCKNER received 6,221 stars (24.8%) from 2,027 voters (57.9%)
    • β˜…#3: KALE R. SEVERSON received 2,359 stars (9.4%) from 824 voters (23.5%)
    • β˜…#4: UWI received 134 stars (0.5%) from 50 voters (1.4%)
  • Finalists:
    • β˜…BLONG YANG (βœ… winner) preferred by 1,842 of 3,499 voters
    • β˜…IAN ALEXANDER preferred by 1,394 of 3,499 voters
    • β˜…No preference between the finalists: 263

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Condorcet/Copeland results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR Condorcet/Copeland results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR/pairwise#pairwise
  • Winner: BLONG YANG
  • Runner-up: IAN ALEXANDER (beats all other candidates except BLONG YANG)
  • Smallest margin: KALE R. SEVERSON over UWI (823-35; margin: 788)
  • Largest margin: BLONG YANG over UWI (2,732-26; margin: 2,706)
  • Pairwise ties: none
  • Total ballots: 3,499

Win-loss-tie (Condorcet/Copeland) table

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR w-l-t table permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR/pairwise#wlt
2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05) pairwise matchups
BLONG YANG
(4-0-0)
BLONG YANG
4 victories ⇣
IAN ALEXANDER
(3-1-0)
BLONG YANG: 1,842(52.6%)
IAN ALEXANDER: 1,394(39.8%)
(No preference: 263; 7.5%)
IAN ALEXANDER
⇽ 1 loss / 3 victories† ⇣
BRETT BUCKNER
(2-2-0)
BLONG YANG: 2,065(59.0%)
BRETT BUCKNER: 1,126(32.2%)
(No preference: 308; 8.8%)
IAN ALEXANDER: 1,564(44.7%)
BRETT BUCKNER: 1,202(34.4%)
(No preference: 733; 20.9%)
BRETT BUCKNER
⇽ 2 losses / 2 victories† ⇣
KALE R. SEVERSON
(1-3-0)
BLONG YANG: 2,541(72.6%)
KALE R. SEVERSON: 452(12.9%)
(No preference: 506; 14.5%)
IAN ALEXANDER: 2,055(58.7%)
KALE R. SEVERSON: 532(15.2%)
(No preference: 912; 26.1%)
BRETT BUCKNER: 1,867(53.4%)
KALE R. SEVERSON: 552(15.8%)
(No preference: 1,080; 30.9%)
KALE R. SEVERSON
⇽ 3 losses / 1 victory† ⇣
UWI
(0-4-0)
BLONG YANG: 2,732(78.1%)
UWI: 26(0.7%)
(No preference: 741; 21.2%)
IAN ALEXANDER: 2,204(63.0%)
UWI: 39(1.1%)
(No preference: 1,256; 35.9%)
BRETT BUCKNER: 2,026(57.9%)
UWI: 34(1.0%)
(No preference: 1,439; 41.1%)
KALE R. SEVERSON: 823(23.5%)
UWI: 35(1.0%)
(No preference: 2,641; 75.5%)

Pairwise tournament (Copeland ordered)

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR pairwise diagram permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-5-CVR/pairwise#dot

%3 BLONG YANG BLONG YANG 4-0-0 (4 wins, 0 losses, 0 ties) IAN ALEXANDER IAN ALEXANDER 3-1-0 BLONG YANG->IAN ALEXANDER ← BLONG YANG: 1842 IAN ALEXANDER: 1394 BRETT BUCKNER BRETT BUCKNER 2-2-0 BLONG YANG->BRETT BUCKNER ← BLONG YANG: 2065 BRETT BUCKNER: 1126 KALE R. SEVERSON KALE R. SEVERSON 1-3-0 BLONG YANG->KALE R. SEVERSON ← BLONG YANG: 2541 KALE R. SEVERSON: 452 UWI UWI 0-4-0 BLONG YANG->UWI ← BLONG YANG: 2732 UWI: 26 IAN ALEXANDER->BRETT BUCKNER ← IAN ALEXANDER: 1564 BRETT BUCKNER: 1202 IAN ALEXANDER->KALE R. SEVERSON ← IAN ALEXANDER: 2055 KALE R. SEVERSON: 532 IAN ALEXANDER->UWI ← IAN ALEXANDER: 2204 UWI: 39 BRETT BUCKNER->KALE R. SEVERSON ← BRETT BUCKNER: 1867 KALE R. SEVERSON: 552 BRETT BUCKNER->UWI ← BRETT BUCKNER: 2026 UWI: 34 KALE R. SEVERSON->UWI ← KALE R. SEVERSON: 823 UWI: 35

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

(homepage)