awt logo

2013-Park-District-4-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05)

🔗 2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Park-District-4-CVR     (tags: { Minneapolis_MN , from-bolson , actual , MN , 2013-11 , 2013 , Minneapolis-2013 })

Below is the ABIF from the "2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Park-District-4-CVR" election (2013-Park-District-4-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

Results

🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Park-District-4-CVR

The STAR results of 2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Park-District-4-CVR are below, and can be edited in the field above.

Method Winner
STAR ANITA TABB
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

STAR results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Park-District-4-CVR STAR results permalink:
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Park-District-4-CVR/STAR#STAR
📝
Note — STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 3 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 2 points, the 2nd choice gets 1 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: ANITA TABB
  • Finalists: ANITA TABB vs BOBBY DAVIS
  • Runoff result:
    • ANITA TABB: 6,685 votes (79.2%)
    • BOBBY DAVIS: 1,692 votes (20.0%)
    • No preference: 67 voters (0.8%)
  • Total stars allocated: 20,052
  • Total ballots: 8,444


(one star above is approximately 401 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • #0: ANITA TABB received 14,242 stars (71.0%) from 7,563 voters (89.6%)
    • #1: BOBBY DAVIS received 5,581 stars (27.8%) from 3,893 voters (46.1%)
    • #2: UWI received 229 stars (1.1%) from 152 voters (1.8%)
  • Finalists:
    • ANITA TABB (✅ winner) preferred by 6,685 of 8,444 voters
    • BOBBY DAVIS preferred by 1,692 of 8,444 voters
    • No preference between the finalists: 67

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

(homepage)