awt logo

School Director Dist. 1 - Oakland (AlamedaCounty; 2020-11-03)

πŸ”— 2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland     (tags: { AlamedaCounty_CA , 2020-11 , from-bolson , actual , CA , AlamedaCounty-2020 , 2020 })

Below is the ABIF from the "2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland" election (School Director Dist. 1 - Oakland (AlamedaCounty; 2020-11-03))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

Results

πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland

Below are the results of the election represented above using various election methods with abiftool/abiflib. The detected ballot type from the ABIF above is "ranked". Some methods may transform these ballots for analysis; see method notices for details. Resubmit the ABIF with "Transform ballots" turned off to minimize the transformations.

Method Winner
IRV/RCV SAM DAVIS
FPTP SAM DAVIS
Approval SAM DAVIS
STAR SAM DAVIS
Condorcet/Copeland SAM DAVIS
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

IRV/RCV results

2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland IRV/RCV result permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland/IRV#IRV

  • IRV/RCV Winner: SAM DAVIS with 20,994 votes (60.7%) in final round
  • Runner-up: AUSTIN DANNHAUS with 12,581 votes (36.4%) in final round
  • Exhausted ballots in final round: 995 (2.9%)
  • Number of rounds: 3
  • Ballots counted in final round: 33,575 (97.1%)
  • Majority of ballots: 17,286 (50.0%)
  • Total ballots: 34,570
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Overview:
Active ballots: 34,570 (100.0%)

Exhausted ballots: 0 (0.0%)
Overvotes: 68 (0.2%)

Counted ballots: 34,502 (99.8%)
Winning threshold: 17,252 (49.90%)
Overview:
Active ballots: 34,502 (99.8%)

Exhausted ballots: 61 (0.2%)
Overvotes: 2 (0.0%)

Counted ballots: 34,439 (99.6%)
Winning threshold: 17,220 (49.81%)
Overview:
Active ballots: 34,500 (99.8%)

Exhausted ballots: 916 (2.6%)
Overvotes: 9 (0.0%)

Counted ballots: 33,575 (97.1%)
Winning threshold: 16,788 (48.56%)
SAM DAVIS: 16,374 (47.4%)
β†’
SAM DAVIS: 16,400 (47.4%)
β†’
IRV/RCV winner:
SAM DAVIS: 20,994 (60.7%)βœ…
β†’
AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 11,630 (33.6%)
β†’
AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 11,655 (33.7%)
β†’
AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 12,581 (36.4%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
STACY THOMAS: 6,350 (18.4%)
β†’
STACY THOMAS: 6,384 (18.5%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
STACY THOMAS
Write-in: 148 (0.4%) (πŸ›‘eliminated)
β†’
Write-in Write-in

Overvotes are ballots where multiple candidates are ranked at the same, highest-ranking position.

FPTP result

"FPTP" is "First-past-the-post", also known as "plurality" or "choose-one"
2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland FPTP results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland/FPTP#FPTP
πŸ“
Note β€” Only using first-choices on ranked ballots

  • FPTP Winner: SAM DAVIS with 16,374 first-place votes (47.4%)
  • Runner-up: AUSTIN DANNHAUS with 11,630 first-place votes (33.6%)
  • Margin of victory: 4,744 votes (13.7 percentage points)
  • First-place votes
    • SAM DAVIS: 16,374 votes (47.4 %)
    • AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 11,630 votes (33.6 %)
    • STACY THOMAS: 6,350 votes (18.4 %)
    • Write-in: 148 votes (0.4 %)
  • Overvotes: 68 (0.2 %)
  • Total ballots: 34,570

Approval voting results

2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland approval voting results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland/approval#approval
πŸ“
Note β€” Approval counts estimated from 34,570 ranked ballots using favorite_viable_half method
Details

The 'favorite_viable_half' conversion algorithm: find the candidate with the most first preferences, and then determine the minimum number of figurative seats that would need to be open in order for the candidate to exceed the Hare quota with the given first-prefs. We use this to estimate how many candidates are likely to be viable candidates.

Using first-choice vote totals as a rough guide, approximately 3 candidates appear viable: SAM DAVIS, AUSTIN DANNHAUS, and STACY THOMAS. The approximation then assumes each voter approves up to 2 of their top-ranked viable candidates (half of 3, rounded up). All candidates ranked at or above the lowest-ranked of each ballot's top viable candidates receive approval (considering up to 2 viable candidates per ballot).

See transformed ballots

Note: For Approval, these choose_many ballots are inferred from ranked ballots.

Conversion method: favorite_viable_half

#------- metadata -------
{ballotcount: 34570}
{version: "0.1"}
{ballotcount_abif_metadata: "34570"}
{is_ranking_to_rating: true}
#------ candlines ------
=Write-in:[Write-in]
=[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]
=[SAM DAVIS]:[SAM DAVIS]
=[STACY THOMAS]:[STACY THOMAS]
#------- votelines ------
5652:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
4942:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
4170:[SAM DAVIS]/1
2765:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2742:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2685:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
2532:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1969:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1467:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1385:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1341:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
826:[STACY THOMAS]/1
779:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
205:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
105:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
36:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
31:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
30:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
23:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
22:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
20:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
19:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
17:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
16:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
16:[SAM DAVIS]/1
15:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
14:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
14:[SAM DAVIS]/1
13:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
13:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
13:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
12:[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
11:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
11:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
11:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
11:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
11:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
11:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
10:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
10:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
10:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
10:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
10:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
9:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
9:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
9:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
9:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
9:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
9:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
9:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
8:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
8:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
8:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
8:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
8:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
8:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
7:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
7:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
7:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
7:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
7:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
7:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
6:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
6:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
6:[STACY THOMAS]/1
6:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
5:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
5:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
5:[STACY THOMAS]/1
5:[STACY THOMAS]/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
5:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
4:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
4:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
4:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
4:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
4:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
4:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
4:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
4:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
4:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
4:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
3:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
3:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
3:[SAM DAVIS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
3:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
2:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
2:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[SAM DAVIS]/1
1:[AUSTIN DANNHAUS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1=Write-in/1
1:[SAM DAVIS]/1=[STACY THOMAS]/1
  • Approval Winner: SAM DAVIS
  • Approval Results:
    • SAM DAVIS — 28,338 approvals (81.97% of ballots) (βœ… winner)
    • AUSTIN DANNHAUS — 19,132 approvals (55.34% of ballots)
    • STACY THOMAS — 13,633 approvals (39.44% of ballots)
    • Write-in — 136 approvals (0.39% of ballots)
  • Total: 34,570 ballots (61,239 total approvals)

STAR results

2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland STAR results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland/STAR#STAR
πŸ“
Note β€” STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 4 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 3 points, the 2nd choice gets 2 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: SAM DAVIS
  • Finalists: SAM DAVIS vs AUSTIN DANNHAUS
  • Runoff result:
    • SAM DAVIS: 21,015 votes (60.8%)
    • AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 12,597 votes (36.4%)
    • No preference: 958 voters (2.8%)
  • Total stars allocated: 175,706
  • Total ballots: 34,570
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
(one star above is approximately 3,514 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • β˜…#0: SAM DAVIS received 75,345 stars (42.9%) from 30,573 voters (88.4%)
    • β˜…#1: AUSTIN DANNHAUS received 54,839 stars (31.2%) from 24,017 voters (69.5%)
    • β˜…#2: STACY THOMAS received 44,658 stars (25.4%) from 24,543 voters (71.0%)
    • β˜…#3: Write-in received 864 stars (0.5%) from 422 voters (1.2%)
  • Finalists:
    • β˜…SAM DAVIS (βœ… winner) preferred by 21,015 of 34,570 voters
    • β˜…AUSTIN DANNHAUS preferred by 12,597 of 34,570 voters
    • β˜…No preference between the finalists: 958

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Condorcet/Copeland results

2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland Condorcet/Copeland results permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland/pairwise#pairwise
  • Winner: SAM DAVIS
  • Runner-up: AUSTIN DANNHAUS (beats all other candidates except SAM DAVIS)
  • Smallest margin: AUSTIN DANNHAUS over STACY THOMAS (18,186-12,055; margin: 6,131)
  • Largest margin: SAM DAVIS over Write-in (30,467-231; margin: 30,236)
  • Pairwise ties: none
  • Total ballots: 34,570

Win-loss-tie (Condorcet/Copeland) table

2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland w-l-t table permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland/pairwise#wlt
School Director Dist. 1 - Oakland (AlamedaCounty; 2020-11-03) pairwise matchups
SAM DAVIS
(3-0-0)
SAM DAVIS
3 victories ⇣
AUSTIN DANNHAUS
(2-1-0)
SAM DAVIS: 21,015(60.8%)
AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 12,597(36.4%)
(No preference: 958; 2.8%)
AUSTIN DANNHAUS
⇽ 1 loss / 2 victories† ⇣
STACY THOMAS
(1-2-0)
SAM DAVIS: 23,739(68.7%)
STACY THOMAS: 8,006(23.2%)
(No preference: 2,825; 8.2%)
AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 18,186(52.6%)
STACY THOMAS: 12,055(34.9%)
(No preference: 4,329; 12.5%)
STACY THOMAS
⇽ 2 losses / 1 victory† ⇣
Write-in
(0-3-0)
SAM DAVIS: 30,467(88.1%)
Write-in: 231(0.7%)
(No preference: 3,872; 11.2%)
AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 23,924(69.2%)
Write-in: 271(0.8%)
(No preference: 10,375; 30.0%)
STACY THOMAS: 24,453(70.7%)
Write-in: 306(0.9%)
(No preference: 9,811; 28.4%)

Pairwise tournament (Copeland ordered)

2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland pairwise diagram permalink:
πŸ”—https://abif.electorama.com/id/2020-11-03_AlamedaCounty-School_Director_Dist._1_-_Oakland/pairwise#dot

%3 SAM DAVIS SAM DAVIS 3-0-0 (3 wins, 0 losses, 0 ties) AUSTIN DANNHAUS AUSTIN DANNHAUS 2-1-0 SAM DAVIS->AUSTIN DANNHAUS ← SAM DAVIS: 21015 AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 12597 STACY THOMAS STACY THOMAS 1-2-0 SAM DAVIS->STACY THOMAS ← SAM DAVIS: 23739 STACY THOMAS: 8006 Write-in Write-in 0-3-0 SAM DAVIS->Write-in ← SAM DAVIS: 30467 Write-in: 231 AUSTIN DANNHAUS->STACY THOMAS ← AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 18186 STACY THOMAS: 12055 AUSTIN DANNHAUS->Write-in ← AUSTIN DANNHAUS: 23924 Write-in: 271 STACY THOMAS->Write-in ← STACY THOMAS: 24453 Write-in: 306

Voting methods: IRV β€’ FPTP β€’ approval β€’ STAR β€’ Pairwise β€’ All methods

(homepage)