awt logo

REP Council Member_48th Council District (NYC; 2023-06-27)

🔗 2023-06-27_NYC-REP_Council_Member_48th_Council_District     (tags: { from-bolson , actual , NYC-2023 , NY , NYC_NY , 2023 , 2023-06 })

Below is the ABIF from the "2023-06-27_NYC-REP_Council_Member_48th_Council_District" election (REP Council Member_48th Council District (NYC; 2023-06-27))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

Results

🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2023-06-27_NYC-REP_Council_Member_48th_Council_District

The STAR results of 2023-06-27_NYC-REP_Council_Member_48th_Council_District are below, and can be edited in the field above.

Method Winner
STAR Inna Vernikov
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

STAR results

2023-06-27_NYC-REP_Council_Member_48th_Council_District STAR results permalink:
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2023-06-27_NYC-REP_Council_Member_48th_Council_District/STAR#STAR
📝
Note — STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 2 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 1 points, the 2nd choice gets 0 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: Inna Vernikov
  • Finalists: Inna Vernikov vs Igor Kazatsker
  • Runoff result:
    • Inna Vernikov: 1,730 votes (70.8%)
    • Igor Kazatsker: 713 votes (29.2%)
    • No preference: 0 voters (0.0%)
  • Total stars allocated: 2,443
  • Total ballots: 2,443


(one star above is approximately 49 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • #0: Inna Vernikov received 1,730 stars (70.8%) from 1,730 voters (70.8%)
    • #1: Igor Kazatsker received 713 stars (29.2%) from 713 voters (29.2%)
  • Finalists:
    • Inna Vernikov (✅ winner) preferred by 1,730 of 2,443 voters
    • Igor Kazatsker preferred by 713 of 2,443 voters
    • No preference between the finalists: 0

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

(homepage)