awt logo

2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05)

🔗 2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR     (tags: { Minneapolis_MN , from-bolson , actual , MN , 2013-11 , 2013 , Minneapolis-2013 })

Below is the ABIF from the "2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR" election (2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR (Minneapolis; 2013-11-05))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

Results

🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR

The STAR results of 2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR are below, and can be edited in the field above.

Method Winner
STAR CAM GORDON
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

STAR results

2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR STAR results permalink:
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/2013-11-05_Minneapolis-2013-Council-Ward-2-CVR/STAR#STAR
📝
Note — STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 3 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 2 points, the 2nd choice gets 1 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: CAM GORDON
  • Finalists: CAM GORDON vs DIANA NEWBERRY
  • Runoff result:
    • CAM GORDON: 4,075 votes (87.4%)
    • DIANA NEWBERRY: 532 votes (11.4%)
    • No preference: 56 voters (1.2%)
  • Total stars allocated: 10,726
  • Total ballots: 4,663


(one star above is approximately 215 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • #0: CAM GORDON received 8,414 stars (78.4%) from 4,351 voters (93.3%)
    • #1: DIANA NEWBERRY received 2,083 stars (19.4%) from 1,558 voters (33.4%)
    • #2: UWI received 229 stars (2.1%) from 154 voters (3.3%)
  • Finalists:
    • CAM GORDON (✅ winner) preferred by 4,075 of 4,663 voters
    • DIANA NEWBERRY preferred by 532 of 4,663 voters
    • No preference between the finalists: 56

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

(homepage)