awt logo

Simple example (Tennessee capitol)

🔗 TNexample     (tags: { theoretical , CondorcetVsIRV , CenterSqueeze , featured })

Below is the ABIF from the "TNexample" election (Simple example (Tennessee capitol))

ABIF submission area (show)
Method options
Ballot options

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

Results

🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/TNexample

The STAR results of TNexample are below, and can be edited in the field above.

Method Winner
STAR Nash
Election results summary showing voting method winners
click/tap to expand
tabbed view

STAR results

TNexample STAR results permalink:
🔗https://abif.electorama.com/id/TNexample/STAR#STAR
📝
Note — STAR ratings estimated from ranked ballots using Borda scoring method
Details

The ranked ballots have been converted to STAR ratings using Borda scoring: each candidate receives points equal to (number_of_candidates - their_rank). In this election, we have 4 candidates, so the 1st choice gets 3 points, the 2nd choice gets 2 points, etc. These Borda scores are then used as STAR ratings for tabulation by STAR.

  • STAR winner: Nash
  • Finalists: Nash vs Chat
  • Runoff result:
    • Nash: 68 votes (68.0%)
    • Chat: 32 votes (32.0%)
    • No preference: 0 voters (0.0%)
  • Total stars allocated: 600
  • Total ballots: 100


(one star above is approximately 12 stars allocated by voters)
  • First round:
    • #0: Nash received 194 stars (32.3%) from 100 voters (100.0%)
    • #1: Chat received 173 stars (28.8%) from 100 voters (100.0%)
    • #2: Memph received 126 stars (21.0%) from 42 voters (42.0%)
    • #3: Knox received 107 stars (17.8%) from 58 voters (58.0%)
  • Finalists:
    • Nash (✅ winner) preferred by 68 of 100 voters
    • Chat preferred by 32 of 100 voters
    • No preference between the finalists: 0

NOTE: Since ratings or stars are not present in the provided ballots, allocated stars are estimated using a Borda-like formula.

Voting methods: IRVFPTPapprovalSTARPairwiseAll methods

(homepage)